← Back to context Comment by smrtinsert 20 days ago The search for agency is heartbreaking. Yikes. 9 comments smrtinsert Reply threethirtytwo 20 days ago Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing. adastra22 20 days ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 20 days ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies → teekert 20 days ago Between the Chinese room and “real” agency? nake89 20 days ago Is it?
threethirtytwo 20 days ago Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing. adastra22 20 days ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 20 days ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies → teekert 20 days ago Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?
adastra22 20 days ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 20 days ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies →
threethirtytwo 20 days ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies →
Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?
Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing.
> Technically no
There's no technical basis for stating that.
Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic.
4 replies →
Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?
Is it?