← Back to context Comment by smrtinsert 1 month ago The search for agency is heartbreaking. Yikes. 9 comments smrtinsert Reply threethirtytwo 1 month ago Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing. adastra22 1 month ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 1 month ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies → teekert 25 days ago Between the Chinese room and “real” agency? nake89 1 month ago Is it?
threethirtytwo 1 month ago Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing. adastra22 1 month ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 1 month ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies → teekert 25 days ago Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?
adastra22 1 month ago > Technically noThere's no technical basis for stating that. threethirtytwo 1 month ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies →
threethirtytwo 1 month ago Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic. 4 replies →
Is text that perfectly with 100% flawless consistency emulates actual agency in such a way that it is impossible to tell the difference than is that still agency?
Technically no, but we wouldn't be able to know otherwise. That gap is closing.
> Technically no
There's no technical basis for stating that.
Text that imitates agency 100 percent perfectly is technically by the word itself an imitation and thus technically not agentic.
4 replies →
Between the Chinese room and “real” agency?
Is it?