← Back to context Comment by pjscott 25 days ago So it looks to be just the latency improvement that's noteworthy, then. Thank you! 4 comments pjscott Reply egl2020 25 days ago Maybe coverage, too? sfblah 25 days ago Yes. Sorry for the brief answer. Too bad I got downvoted. There's no size improvement. kortilla 25 days ago It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement.SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers. sfblah 22 days ago They would if they could bilk more taxpayer money for it.
sfblah 25 days ago Yes. Sorry for the brief answer. Too bad I got downvoted. There's no size improvement. kortilla 25 days ago It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement.SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers. sfblah 22 days ago They would if they could bilk more taxpayer money for it.
kortilla 25 days ago It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement.SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers. sfblah 22 days ago They would if they could bilk more taxpayer money for it.
Maybe coverage, too?
Yes. Sorry for the brief answer. Too bad I got downvoted. There's no size improvement.
It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement.
SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers.
They would if they could bilk more taxpayer money for it.