Comment by catdog

> A better formulation is "every feature is a liability". Taking it to the line of code level is too prescriptive.

Amount of code is a huge factor but maybe not the best wording here. It's more a thing of complexity where amount of code is a contributing metric but not the only one. You can very easily have a feature implemented in a too complex way and with too much code (esp. if an LLM generated the code but also with human developers). Also not every feature is equal.

> Occasionally writing more verbose code is preferable if it makes it easier to understand.

Think this is more a classic case of "if the metric becomes a goal it ceases to be a metric" than it being a bad metric per se.