← Back to context

Comment by necovek

23 days ago

I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.

So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?

That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?

  • I object to your conclusion that "they have no durable principles": not sure how do you get to that from two different experiences documented with a single paragraph.