← Back to context

Comment by bopbopbop7

9 hours ago

> even with the help of AI.

This is what you get when you build with AI, an electron app with an input field.

Doesn't have to be. I just revived one of my C++ GLFW app from 2009. Codex was able to help me get it running again and added some nice new features.

I guess you get an Electron app if you don't prompt it otherwise. Probably because it's learned from what all the humans are putting out there these days.

That said.. unless you know better, it's going to keep happening. Even moreso when folks aren't learning the fundamentals anymore.

I've done way, way more than that, as I'm sure others have too.

This is just bad product management.

  • So where is all this amazing software that you and others built with AI?

    All I see is hype blog posts and pre-IPO marketing by AI companies, not much being shipped though.

    • You won't see it because it's mostly personal software for personal computers.

      I've got a medical doctor handwriting decipherer, a board game simulator that takes a PDF of the rulebooks as input and an accounting/budgeting software that can interface with my bank via email because my bank doesn't have an API.

      None of that is of any use to you. If you happen to need a similar software, it will be easier for you to ask your own AI to make a custom one for you rather than adapt the ones I had my AI make for me.

      Under the circumstances, I would feel bad shipping anything. My users would be legitimately better off just vibe coding their own versions.

      1 reply →

  • Their goal is to ship as fast as possible b/c they don't care about what you care about. Their objective is to gather as much data as possible & electron is good enough for that.

    • I work at OpenAI, and I get the concern. From our side, this was a careful tradeoff: Electron lets us iterate faster and makes it possible to bring the Codex app to Windows and Linux very soon. That doesn’t mean performance or UX don’t matter—we’re actively paying attention to both.

      Would genuinely love your thoughts if you try it. Early users have been surprised by how native it feels!

      5 replies →

Claude code is perfectly capable of writing low level rendering and input code and it can be equally as mindless as vibe coding web apps.

E.g. just say "write a c++ gui widget library using dx11 and win32 and copy flutters layout philosophy, use harfbuzz for shaping, etc etc"

At the end of the day LLMs just reproduce the consensus of the internet, so it makes sense that a coding agent would spit out software that looks like most of what's on the internet.

LLM output is called slop for a reason.