← Back to context Comment by twism 9 hours ago > space is called “space” for a reason. 5 comments twism Reply momoschili 8 hours ago you think we don't have enough space on earth for a few buildings? this seems like a purely western cope. China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USA Marsymars 7 hours ago > China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USAChina has a land area greater than the USA. (Continental or otherwise.) usui 6 hours ago Not true. China 9.6 million square kilometers, USA 9.8 million square kilometers, contiguous 8.1 million. 1 reply → momoschili 4 hours ago sure, we can neglect the water, but the USA has much more usable flat land than China, and that is a pretty inarguable point.
momoschili 8 hours ago you think we don't have enough space on earth for a few buildings? this seems like a purely western cope. China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USA Marsymars 7 hours ago > China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USAChina has a land area greater than the USA. (Continental or otherwise.) usui 6 hours ago Not true. China 9.6 million square kilometers, USA 9.8 million square kilometers, contiguous 8.1 million. 1 reply → momoschili 4 hours ago sure, we can neglect the water, but the USA has much more usable flat land than China, and that is a pretty inarguable point.
Marsymars 7 hours ago > China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USAChina has a land area greater than the USA. (Continental or otherwise.) usui 6 hours ago Not true. China 9.6 million square kilometers, USA 9.8 million square kilometers, contiguous 8.1 million. 1 reply → momoschili 4 hours ago sure, we can neglect the water, but the USA has much more usable flat land than China, and that is a pretty inarguable point.
usui 6 hours ago Not true. China 9.6 million square kilometers, USA 9.8 million square kilometers, contiguous 8.1 million. 1 reply →
momoschili 4 hours ago sure, we can neglect the water, but the USA has much more usable flat land than China, and that is a pretty inarguable point.
you think we don't have enough space on earth for a few buildings? this seems like a purely western cope. China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USA
> China seems perfectly able to build out large infrastructure projects with a land area smaller than that of the continentenal USA
China has a land area greater than the USA. (Continental or otherwise.)
Not true. China 9.6 million square kilometers, USA 9.8 million square kilometers, contiguous 8.1 million.
1 reply →
sure, we can neglect the water, but the USA has much more usable flat land than China, and that is a pretty inarguable point.