Comment by SilverElfin
13 hours ago
I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.
13 hours ago
I disagree. He would be using taxpayer money to boost his preferred speech. And it is essentially campaign funding for the GOP. It should be treated as such.
I think that line of argument would work in my country of birth, the UK, but I don't think it works in the USA.
You do not lose your right to free speech by providing contractual services to the US government.