← Back to context Comment by tlhunter 4 hours ago About time. It's absolutely ridiculous that this hasn't existed for the past 10 years. 5 comments tlhunter Reply wavemode 3 hours ago yeah, I thought they were going to provide some sort of rationale as to why they've never implemented this. instead this post just basically goes "yeah, you guys have been asking for this feature for 10 years, and... it's a good idea! let's do it." drob518 4 hours ago Exactly. Yes, please. gscho 4 hours ago Just make the repo private? Carrok 3 hours ago "I am fine with my code being public, but I am not fine being badgered by people about changes I have no interest in." is a perfectly valid stance. ethin 4 hours ago That doesn't work. What if your repo is a mirror of another repo?
wavemode 3 hours ago yeah, I thought they were going to provide some sort of rationale as to why they've never implemented this. instead this post just basically goes "yeah, you guys have been asking for this feature for 10 years, and... it's a good idea! let's do it."
gscho 4 hours ago Just make the repo private? Carrok 3 hours ago "I am fine with my code being public, but I am not fine being badgered by people about changes I have no interest in." is a perfectly valid stance. ethin 4 hours ago That doesn't work. What if your repo is a mirror of another repo?
Carrok 3 hours ago "I am fine with my code being public, but I am not fine being badgered by people about changes I have no interest in." is a perfectly valid stance.
yeah, I thought they were going to provide some sort of rationale as to why they've never implemented this. instead this post just basically goes "yeah, you guys have been asking for this feature for 10 years, and... it's a good idea! let's do it."
Exactly. Yes, please.
Just make the repo private?
"I am fine with my code being public, but I am not fine being badgered by people about changes I have no interest in." is a perfectly valid stance.
That doesn't work. What if your repo is a mirror of another repo?