← Back to context

Comment by amarcheschi

17 hours ago

I think you can replace copyright with whatever the law <insert big company here> wants to break

Last but not least, generating csam and deep fakes porn on social medias and having to see it called free speech

All of that last one really says is that broadly speaking the average person has no idea what free speech actually is and the kinds of things that it covers. I put it in the same bucket as like the young kids uploading to YouTube with the comment no copyright infringement intended thinking it's like plagiarism.

  • Can you elaborate on your view about "no copyright infringement intended" being related please?