← Back to context

Comment by ramuel

12 hours ago

Musk and X don't seem to be the type to care about any laws or any compelling legal requests, especially from a foreign government. I doubt the French will get anything other than this headline.

Getting kicked out of the EU is extremely unattractive for Twitter. But the US also has extradition treaties so that’s hardly the end of how far they can escalate.

  • I don't think US will extradite anybody to EU. Especially not white people with strong support of the current government.

    • White people already extradited to the EU during the current administration would disagree. But this administration has a limited shelf life, even hypothetically just under 3 years of immunity isn’t enough for comfort.

      1 reply →

    • > don't think US will extradite anybody to EU

      EU, maybe not. France? A nuclear state? Paris is properly sovereign.

      > people with strong support of the current government

      Also known as leverage.

      Let Musk off the hook for a sweetheart trade deal. Trump has a track record of chickening out when others show strength.

      5 replies →

If I'm an employee working in the X office in France, and the police come in and show me they have a warrant for all the computers in the building and tell me to unlock the laptop, I'm probably going to do that, no matter what musk thinks

  • Witnesses can generally not refuse in these situations, that's plain contempt and/or obstruction. Additionally, in France a suspect not revealing their keys is also contempt (UK as well).

    • 100%. Only additional troubles for yourself personally, for practically no benefit (nobody in the company is going to celebrate you).

The game changed when Trump threatened the use of military force to seize Greenland.

At this point a nuclear power like France has no issue with using covert violence to produce compliance from Musk and he must know it.

These people have proven themselves to be existential threats to French security and France will do whatever they feel is necessary to neutralize that threat.

Musk is free to ignore French rule of law if he wants to risk being involved in an airplane accident that will have rumours and conspiracies swirling around it long after he’s dead and his body is strewn all over the ocean somewhere.

  • You're implying that France is going to become a terrorist state? Because suspicious accidents do not sound like rule of law.

    • Killing foreigners outside of the own country has always been deemed acceptable by governments that are (or were until recently) considered to generally follow rule of law as well as the majority of their citizen. It also doesn't necessarily contradicts rule of law.

      It's just that the West has avoided to do that to each other because they were all essentially allied until recently and because the political implications were deemed too severe.

      I don't think however France has anything to win by doing it or has any interest whatsoever and I doubt there's a legal framework the French government can or want to exploit to conduct something like that legally (like calling something an emergency situation or a terrorist group, for example).

    • People were surprised when the US started just droning boats in the Caribbean and wiping out survivors, but then the government explained that it was law enforcement and not terrorism or piracy, so everyone stopped worrying about it.

      Seriously, every powerful state engages in state terrorism from time to time because they can, and the embarrassment of discovery is weighed against the benefit of eliminating a problem. France is no exception : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior

    • Counter-point. France has already kidnapped another social media CEO and forced him to give up the encryption keys. The moral difference between France (historically or currently) and a 3rd wold warlord is very thin. Also, look at the accusations. CP and political extremism are the classic go-tos when a government doesn't really have a reason to put pressure on someone but they really want to anyway. France has a very questionable history of honoring rule of law in politics. Putting political enemies in prison on questionable charges has a long history there.

      1 reply →

    • No difference in a strike like that and the strikes against fishing boats near Venezuela trump has ordered

    • > You're implying that France is going to become a terrorist state? Because suspicious accidents do not sound like rule of law.

      Why not? After all, that's in vogue today. Trump is ignoring all the international agreements and rules, so why should others follow them?

    • Become? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior

      The second Donald Trump threatened to invade a nation allied with France is the second anyone who works with Trump became a legitimate military target.

      Like a cruel child dismembering a spider one limb at a time France and other nations around the world will meticulously destroy whatever resources people like Musk have and the influence it gives him over their countries.

      If Musk displays a sufficient level of resistance to these actions the French will simply assassinate him.

      1 reply →