← Back to context Comment by int_19h 12 hours ago Holocaust denial is illegal in France, for one, and Grok did exactly that on several occasions. 5 comments int_19h Reply pyrale 12 hours ago Also, csam and pornographic content using the likeness of unwilling people. Grok’s recent shit was bound to have consequences. chrisjj 9 hours ago If the French suspected Grok/X of something as serious as CSAM, you can bet they would have mentioned it their statement. They didn't. Porn, they did. pyrale 4 hours ago The first two points of the official document, which I re-quote below, are about CSAM.> complicité de détention d’images de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique> complicité de diffusion, offre ou mise à disposition en bande organisée d'image de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique[1]: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files... 2 replies →
pyrale 12 hours ago Also, csam and pornographic content using the likeness of unwilling people. Grok’s recent shit was bound to have consequences. chrisjj 9 hours ago If the French suspected Grok/X of something as serious as CSAM, you can bet they would have mentioned it their statement. They didn't. Porn, they did. pyrale 4 hours ago The first two points of the official document, which I re-quote below, are about CSAM.> complicité de détention d’images de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique> complicité de diffusion, offre ou mise à disposition en bande organisée d'image de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique[1]: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files... 2 replies →
chrisjj 9 hours ago If the French suspected Grok/X of something as serious as CSAM, you can bet they would have mentioned it their statement. They didn't. Porn, they did. pyrale 4 hours ago The first two points of the official document, which I re-quote below, are about CSAM.> complicité de détention d’images de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique> complicité de diffusion, offre ou mise à disposition en bande organisée d'image de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique[1]: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files... 2 replies →
pyrale 4 hours ago The first two points of the official document, which I re-quote below, are about CSAM.> complicité de détention d’images de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique> complicité de diffusion, offre ou mise à disposition en bande organisée d'image de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique[1]: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files... 2 replies →
Also, csam and pornographic content using the likeness of unwilling people. Grok’s recent shit was bound to have consequences.
If the French suspected Grok/X of something as serious as CSAM, you can bet they would have mentioned it their statement. They didn't. Porn, they did.
The first two points of the official document, which I re-quote below, are about CSAM.
> complicité de détention d’images de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique
> complicité de diffusion, offre ou mise à disposition en bande organisée d'image de mineurs présentant un caractère pédopornographique
[1]: https://www.tribunal-de-paris.justice.fr/sites/default/files...
2 replies →