← Back to context Comment by indigodaddy 20 days ago So if one were theoretically infected right now, would a Malwarebytes scan indicate as such? 3 comments indigodaddy Reply krackers 20 days ago OP post has an indicators of compromise list, also seen in https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-chrysalis-backdoor-dive-...I'm surprised this wasn't linked from the original notepad++ disclosure krige 20 days ago If you can get Malwarebytes to scan anything. It has been such a victim of enshittification, it's not remotely as useful as it were several years ago. TurboSkyline 20 days ago In what ways? I'm still using it the same way I was 10 years ago—on-demand scans of individual files—and it seems to work just as well.
krackers 20 days ago OP post has an indicators of compromise list, also seen in https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-chrysalis-backdoor-dive-...I'm surprised this wasn't linked from the original notepad++ disclosure
krige 20 days ago If you can get Malwarebytes to scan anything. It has been such a victim of enshittification, it's not remotely as useful as it were several years ago. TurboSkyline 20 days ago In what ways? I'm still using it the same way I was 10 years ago—on-demand scans of individual files—and it seems to work just as well.
TurboSkyline 20 days ago In what ways? I'm still using it the same way I was 10 years ago—on-demand scans of individual files—and it seems to work just as well.
OP post has an indicators of compromise list, also seen in https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-chrysalis-backdoor-dive-...
I'm surprised this wasn't linked from the original notepad++ disclosure
If you can get Malwarebytes to scan anything. It has been such a victim of enshittification, it's not remotely as useful as it were several years ago.
In what ways? I'm still using it the same way I was 10 years ago—on-demand scans of individual files—and it seems to work just as well.