← Back to context Comment by bluGill 1 day ago Cannons were regularly privately owned at the time 1 comment bluGill Reply Retric 1 day ago For sake of argument I’ll agree, but again by explicitly using arms here they where excluding them from constitutional protection not banning them.
Retric 1 day ago For sake of argument I’ll agree, but again by explicitly using arms here they where excluding them from constitutional protection not banning them.
For sake of argument I’ll agree, but again by explicitly using arms here they where excluding them from constitutional protection not banning them.