← Back to context

Comment by _0ffh

20 days ago

> Celsius also aligns well with Kelvins without fractions (unlike fahrenheit).

But Fahrenheit aligns well with Rankine without fractions (unlike Celsius). [Imagine some symbol here indicating humour.]

I chuckled ... and yet remain on side with Celsius.

  • Fahrenheit has finer granularity without fractions.

    IOW each Celsius degree is bigger than each Fahrenheit degree.

    Even though the F numbers are so much higher and it seems unbearably hot :)

    So for a thermostat that only can be set in 1 degree increments (without a decimal point), you have finer control when using F than using C.

    Anybody can memorize the conversion more easily by throwing out the math, using table lookup -- made easier by throwing out most of the table too.

    Just remember every 5 C equals a non-fractional F.

    And every 5 C equals 9 F.

    If all you are interested in is comfort level it's like this:

       C   F
      
       0  32
       5  41
      10  50
      15  59
      20  68
      25  77
      30  86
      35  95
      40 104
      

    Least significant digit of F drops by 1 every time without fail.

    Looks like it increases by 1 each time in the tens column, but it's only 9 so 50 & 59 are the outliers, which most people have memorized already.

    If you are a Celsius native and you think in terms of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 -- you only need to remember 5 different F numbers, 50, 59, 68, 77 & 86 and that will get you far.

    Good luck using these as your lottery numbers ;)

    • Ahhh, I mean that's all very well .. but I'm over 60 and I've literally never used or needed to use Fahrenheit - and I had a long career in geophysical and physical data aquisition, ran several kinds of furnaces and annealing ovens 24/7 for a decade, do a lot of cooking, etc.

      So, I appreciate your rendition of things I have tables for already but any actual need is sadly non existant.

      1 reply →