← Back to context Comment by twelvechairs 1 day ago Theres only one solution to this problem and its 2 data centres in some way or form 2 comments twelvechairs Reply mbreese 1 day ago What's the line from Contact?why build one when you can have two at twice the price?But, if you're building a datacenter for $5M, spending $10-15M for redundant datacenters (even with extra networking costs), would still be cheaper than their estimated $25M cloud costs. golem14 1 day ago Or build two 2.5MM DCs (if can parallelize your workload well enough) and in case of disaster, you only lose capacity.You need however plan for 1MM+ pa in OPEX because good SREs ain’t cheap (or hardware guys building and maintaining machines)
mbreese 1 day ago What's the line from Contact?why build one when you can have two at twice the price?But, if you're building a datacenter for $5M, spending $10-15M for redundant datacenters (even with extra networking costs), would still be cheaper than their estimated $25M cloud costs. golem14 1 day ago Or build two 2.5MM DCs (if can parallelize your workload well enough) and in case of disaster, you only lose capacity.You need however plan for 1MM+ pa in OPEX because good SREs ain’t cheap (or hardware guys building and maintaining machines)
golem14 1 day ago Or build two 2.5MM DCs (if can parallelize your workload well enough) and in case of disaster, you only lose capacity.You need however plan for 1MM+ pa in OPEX because good SREs ain’t cheap (or hardware guys building and maintaining machines)
What's the line from Contact?
why build one when you can have two at twice the price?
But, if you're building a datacenter for $5M, spending $10-15M for redundant datacenters (even with extra networking costs), would still be cheaper than their estimated $25M cloud costs.
Or build two 2.5MM DCs (if can parallelize your workload well enough) and in case of disaster, you only lose capacity.
You need however plan for 1MM+ pa in OPEX because good SREs ain’t cheap (or hardware guys building and maintaining machines)