← Back to context Comment by PunchyHamster 15 hours ago You wanted a server and complain NAS is not just a server. 6 comments PunchyHamster Reply Gud 12 hours ago More like, user wanted an open operating system but chose a proprietary one. atmosx 11 hours ago NAS is the primary function. But yes, I want full linux server that I can decide what to install and which protocol to use to upload and/or download files. criddell 9 hours ago Why not just leave the NAS to be a NAS and get a separate server? You're probably better off not trying to overload the NAS to be everything. Hikikomori 4 hours ago Why do I want two things when I can have one? Newer nases with n100 or similar are pretty powerful for the cost/package. ssl-3 8 hours ago Can you provide some details about this overloading concept? lurking_swe 7 hours ago is there a reason you didn’t consider one of the uGreen NAS’s?
atmosx 11 hours ago NAS is the primary function. But yes, I want full linux server that I can decide what to install and which protocol to use to upload and/or download files. criddell 9 hours ago Why not just leave the NAS to be a NAS and get a separate server? You're probably better off not trying to overload the NAS to be everything. Hikikomori 4 hours ago Why do I want two things when I can have one? Newer nases with n100 or similar are pretty powerful for the cost/package. ssl-3 8 hours ago Can you provide some details about this overloading concept? lurking_swe 7 hours ago is there a reason you didn’t consider one of the uGreen NAS’s?
criddell 9 hours ago Why not just leave the NAS to be a NAS and get a separate server? You're probably better off not trying to overload the NAS to be everything. Hikikomori 4 hours ago Why do I want two things when I can have one? Newer nases with n100 or similar are pretty powerful for the cost/package. ssl-3 8 hours ago Can you provide some details about this overloading concept?
Hikikomori 4 hours ago Why do I want two things when I can have one? Newer nases with n100 or similar are pretty powerful for the cost/package.
More like, user wanted an open operating system but chose a proprietary one.
NAS is the primary function. But yes, I want full linux server that I can decide what to install and which protocol to use to upload and/or download files.
Why not just leave the NAS to be a NAS and get a separate server? You're probably better off not trying to overload the NAS to be everything.
Why do I want two things when I can have one? Newer nases with n100 or similar are pretty powerful for the cost/package.
Can you provide some details about this overloading concept?
is there a reason you didn’t consider one of the uGreen NAS’s?