← Back to context Comment by hk__2 19 days ago And the CIA is impartial? ;) 3 comments hk__2 Reply alex1138 19 days ago Do please take note of the fact that I did not include "We should trust the CIA" in my comment hk__2 18 days ago No, but you seemed to imply there are people that aren’t partial. Wikipedia is designed to approach impartiality even if its editors are people like you and me who are far from impartial. Are there better alternatives out there? alex1138 18 days ago Wikipedia is incredibly weaponized. I meant what I said
alex1138 19 days ago Do please take note of the fact that I did not include "We should trust the CIA" in my comment hk__2 18 days ago No, but you seemed to imply there are people that aren’t partial. Wikipedia is designed to approach impartiality even if its editors are people like you and me who are far from impartial. Are there better alternatives out there? alex1138 18 days ago Wikipedia is incredibly weaponized. I meant what I said
hk__2 18 days ago No, but you seemed to imply there are people that aren’t partial. Wikipedia is designed to approach impartiality even if its editors are people like you and me who are far from impartial. Are there better alternatives out there? alex1138 18 days ago Wikipedia is incredibly weaponized. I meant what I said
Do please take note of the fact that I did not include "We should trust the CIA" in my comment
No, but you seemed to imply there are people that aren’t partial. Wikipedia is designed to approach impartiality even if its editors are people like you and me who are far from impartial. Are there better alternatives out there?
Wikipedia is incredibly weaponized. I meant what I said