← Back to context

Comment by AlecSchueler

17 days ago

> Why do you choose that single example, which I said was just that

Because we're looking for people saying borders should be completely opened. An example of people saying something else is irrelevant.

> Yes, people who use "no one is illegal" do also say "no more borders".

Ok but the conversation is about people saying the latter. It was you who brought the former into the conversation.

> Here a UK example

Which British parties are active in the United States?

> Another example, also showing this is an older movement

The claim was that "the left" has no response to emigration issues beyond "open all borders" and that this was the policy of "one party." The existence of an anti-borders movement is again irrelevant to the questions I raised in response to this assertion.

[flagged]

  • > Liar! That is mentioned by many throughout this discussion!

    Not in this thread, no. I asked a question in response to a specific assertion.

    > What does THAT have to do with anything??? Why do YOIU suddenly limit this international phenomenon to just the US?

    Because the assertion I responded to with my questions was based in that context.

    > I explicitly pointed out that it is older and international and not recent and US-only!

    And again, it's irrelevant to the point at hand. Goodbye now.