← Back to context Comment by krona 14 hours ago Sounds like a web developer defined the solution a year before they knew what the problem was. 2 comments krona Reply jama211 4 hours ago Nah. It’s just web development languages are a better fit for agentic coding presently. They weighed the pros and cons, they’re not stupid. shimman 3 hours ago Of course they can be stupid, hubris is a real thing and humans fail all the time.
jama211 4 hours ago Nah. It’s just web development languages are a better fit for agentic coding presently. They weighed the pros and cons, they’re not stupid. shimman 3 hours ago Of course they can be stupid, hubris is a real thing and humans fail all the time.
shimman 3 hours ago Of course they can be stupid, hubris is a real thing and humans fail all the time.
Nah. It’s just web development languages are a better fit for agentic coding presently. They weighed the pros and cons, they’re not stupid.
Of course they can be stupid, hubris is a real thing and humans fail all the time.