Comment by margalabargala
11 hours ago
I suspect they're training on this.
I asked Opus 4.6 for a pelican riding a recumbent bicycle and got this.
11 hours ago
I suspect they're training on this.
I asked Opus 4.6 for a pelican riding a recumbent bicycle and got this.
It would be way way better if they were benchmaxxing this. The pelican in the image (both images) has arms. Pelicans don't have arms, and a pelican riding a bike would use it's wings.
Having briefly worked in the 3D Graphics industry, I don't even remotely trust benchmarks anymore. The minute someone's benchmark performance becomes a part of the public's purchasing decision, companies will pull out every trick in the book--clean or dirty--to benchmaxx their product. Sometimes at the expense of actual real-world performance.
Pelicans don’t ride bikes. You can’t have scruples about whether or not the image of a pelican riding a bike has arms.
Wouldn’t any decent bike-riding pelican have a bike tailored to pelicans and their wings?
2 replies →
Interesting that it seems better. Maybe something about adding a highly specific yet unusual qualifier focusing attention?
perhaps try a penny farthing?