← Back to context

Comment by tallytarik

11 hours ago

Yes this is clearly verbatim output from an LLM.

But it's perfect HN bait, really. The title is spicy enough that folks will comment without reading the article (more so than usual), and so it survives a bit longer before being flagged as slop.

Is HN guidelines to flag AI content? I am unsure of how flagging for this is supposed to work on HN and have only ever used the flag feature for obvious spam or scams.

  • It might be wrong, but I have started flagging this shit daily. Garbage articles that waste my time as a person who comes on here to find good articles.

    I understand that reading the title and probably skimming the article makes it a good jumping off point for a comment thread. I do like the HN comments but I don't want it to be just some forum of curious tech folks, I want it to be a place I find interesting content too.

    • I agree. It seems this is kind of a shelling point right now on HN and there isn't a clear guideline yet. I think your usage of flagging makes sense. Thanks