← Back to context Comment by webstrand 3 hours ago MitM isn't even necessary, a rogue DHCP server configuring a malicious DNS could attack this. 2 comments webstrand Reply burnt-resistor 2 hours ago That's still a MITM, albeit a LAN-local one. Non-LAN WAN isn't the total scope of MITMs. kortilla 2 hours ago That is a form of MiTM. It’s just changing DNS to IP bindings rather than IP to MAC or prefix to ISP.
burnt-resistor 2 hours ago That's still a MITM, albeit a LAN-local one. Non-LAN WAN isn't the total scope of MITMs.
kortilla 2 hours ago That is a form of MiTM. It’s just changing DNS to IP bindings rather than IP to MAC or prefix to ISP.
That's still a MITM, albeit a LAN-local one. Non-LAN WAN isn't the total scope of MITMs.
That is a form of MiTM. It’s just changing DNS to IP bindings rather than IP to MAC or prefix to ISP.