Our approach is actually very cost-effective compared to alternatives. Our browser uses a token-efficient LLM-friendly representation of the webpage that keeps context size low, while also allowing small and efficient models to handle the low-level navigation. This means agents like Claude can work at a higher abstraction level rather than burning tokens on every click and scroll, which would be far more expensive
I'm paying a fixed amount on Claude and other agents, so "more tokens" is "free" for me. There's a lot of niche tools out there but I think we all have "subscription fatigue".
But maybe that's just me - Maybe im just not your target audience :)
Our approach is actually very cost-effective compared to alternatives. Our browser uses a token-efficient LLM-friendly representation of the webpage that keeps context size low, while also allowing small and efficient models to handle the low-level navigation. This means agents like Claude can work at a higher abstraction level rather than burning tokens on every click and scroll, which would be far more expensive
If a potential user says it is too expensive, better to ask why than to tell them they are wrong. You likely have assumptions you have not validated
Definitely! Making Smooth as cost-effective as possible it's been a core goal for us, so we'd really love to hear your thoughts on this
We'll continue to make Smooth more affordable and accessible as this is a core principle of our work (https://www.smooth.sh/images/comparison.gif)
2 replies →
I'm paying a fixed amount on Claude and other agents, so "more tokens" is "free" for me. There's a lot of niche tools out there but I think we all have "subscription fatigue".
But maybe that's just me - Maybe im just not your target audience :)
[dead]