← Back to context Comment by repelsteeltje 8 hours ago ...But no way can you wrap it into something that looks posix-y from the inside 3 comments repelsteeltje Reply p_ing 8 hours ago Why would you want to? repelsteeltje 8 hours ago From the article, first use case:> Example use cases include:> * Running unmodified Linux programs on Windows> * ...That won't work if the unplugged Linux program assumes that mv replaces a file atomically; ntfs can't offer that. p_ing 3 hours ago NTFS uses atomic transactions, that's the only way it has the ability to recover after a fault.You can read more if you wish in 'Inside the Windows NT File System' by Helen Custer, page 15.
p_ing 8 hours ago Why would you want to? repelsteeltje 8 hours ago From the article, first use case:> Example use cases include:> * Running unmodified Linux programs on Windows> * ...That won't work if the unplugged Linux program assumes that mv replaces a file atomically; ntfs can't offer that. p_ing 3 hours ago NTFS uses atomic transactions, that's the only way it has the ability to recover after a fault.You can read more if you wish in 'Inside the Windows NT File System' by Helen Custer, page 15.
repelsteeltje 8 hours ago From the article, first use case:> Example use cases include:> * Running unmodified Linux programs on Windows> * ...That won't work if the unplugged Linux program assumes that mv replaces a file atomically; ntfs can't offer that. p_ing 3 hours ago NTFS uses atomic transactions, that's the only way it has the ability to recover after a fault.You can read more if you wish in 'Inside the Windows NT File System' by Helen Custer, page 15.
p_ing 3 hours ago NTFS uses atomic transactions, that's the only way it has the ability to recover after a fault.You can read more if you wish in 'Inside the Windows NT File System' by Helen Custer, page 15.
Why would you want to?
From the article, first use case:
> Example use cases include:
> * Running unmodified Linux programs on Windows
> * ...
That won't work if the unplugged Linux program assumes that mv replaces a file atomically; ntfs can't offer that.
NTFS uses atomic transactions, that's the only way it has the ability to recover after a fault.
You can read more if you wish in 'Inside the Windows NT File System' by Helen Custer, page 15.