← Back to context Comment by replooda 5 hours ago The criticism was directed at the company's product, not the employees... 5 comments replooda Reply trimethylpurine 4 hours ago The response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows. replooda 33 minutes ago Maybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise. mcmcmc 3 hours ago And yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products. 1f60c 1 hour ago Thaaat's capitalism
trimethylpurine 4 hours ago The response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows. replooda 33 minutes ago Maybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise. mcmcmc 3 hours ago And yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products. 1f60c 1 hour ago Thaaat's capitalism
replooda 33 minutes ago Maybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise.
mcmcmc 3 hours ago And yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products. 1f60c 1 hour ago Thaaat's capitalism
The response appears to be pointing out that with so many employees (engineers), it's unlikely that they all work on Windows.
Maybe. But interpreting it thus requires too much charitableness for it not to have been uncharitable, whether intentionally or otherwise.
And yet they still work for a company that has shown it isn’t overly concerned about quality or reliability in its products.
Thaaat's capitalism