← Back to context Comment by computerex 20 days ago Can you be specific? You didn't provide any constructive feedback, whatsoever. 2 comments computerex Reply einpoklum 20 days ago The article did not provide a constructive suggestion on how to write quality code, either. Nor even empirical proof in the form of quality code written by LLMs/agents via the application of those principles. computerex 20 days ago Yes it did, it provided 12 things that the author asserts helps produce quality code. Feel free to address the content with something productive.
einpoklum 20 days ago The article did not provide a constructive suggestion on how to write quality code, either. Nor even empirical proof in the form of quality code written by LLMs/agents via the application of those principles. computerex 20 days ago Yes it did, it provided 12 things that the author asserts helps produce quality code. Feel free to address the content with something productive.
computerex 20 days ago Yes it did, it provided 12 things that the author asserts helps produce quality code. Feel free to address the content with something productive.
The article did not provide a constructive suggestion on how to write quality code, either. Nor even empirical proof in the form of quality code written by LLMs/agents via the application of those principles.
Yes it did, it provided 12 things that the author asserts helps produce quality code. Feel free to address the content with something productive.