← Back to context Comment by margalabargala 20 days ago Why do you doubt it? Sounds like the owner didn't care. If it was a house, what would be different? 2 comments margalabargala Reply strken 20 days ago Spending 7am to 7pm next to a homeless encampment isn't the same as sleeping next to it, or letting your wife and kids sleep next to it.Although in this instance I think NIMBYism is less useful than having functioning local government, police, and homeless services. pandaman 20 days ago Because the owner didn't live in his store he could afford not to care.
strken 20 days ago Spending 7am to 7pm next to a homeless encampment isn't the same as sleeping next to it, or letting your wife and kids sleep next to it.Although in this instance I think NIMBYism is less useful than having functioning local government, police, and homeless services.
Spending 7am to 7pm next to a homeless encampment isn't the same as sleeping next to it, or letting your wife and kids sleep next to it.
Although in this instance I think NIMBYism is less useful than having functioning local government, police, and homeless services.
Because the owner didn't live in his store he could afford not to care.