← Back to context Comment by Cloudef 20 days ago Emulating mac or using mac SDKs on non apple devices is against apple's bullshit license though. 10 comments Cloudef Reply freakynit 20 days ago BS needs to be countered with rejection. sagarm 19 days ago Best way to reject it is to ignore macOS. chongli 20 days ago If Apple finds out they’ll ban your developer certificates and then all installed copies of your app will stop working. Wowfunhappy 20 days ago Has this ever happened? Not revoking certificates, which they've certainly done for malware or e.g. iOS "signing services", but because a developer used non-Apple hardware. 6 replies →
freakynit 20 days ago BS needs to be countered with rejection. sagarm 19 days ago Best way to reject it is to ignore macOS. chongli 20 days ago If Apple finds out they’ll ban your developer certificates and then all installed copies of your app will stop working. Wowfunhappy 20 days ago Has this ever happened? Not revoking certificates, which they've certainly done for malware or e.g. iOS "signing services", but because a developer used non-Apple hardware. 6 replies →
chongli 20 days ago If Apple finds out they’ll ban your developer certificates and then all installed copies of your app will stop working. Wowfunhappy 20 days ago Has this ever happened? Not revoking certificates, which they've certainly done for malware or e.g. iOS "signing services", but because a developer used non-Apple hardware. 6 replies →
Wowfunhappy 20 days ago Has this ever happened? Not revoking certificates, which they've certainly done for malware or e.g. iOS "signing services", but because a developer used non-Apple hardware. 6 replies →
BS needs to be countered with rejection.
Best way to reject it is to ignore macOS.
If Apple finds out they’ll ban your developer certificates and then all installed copies of your app will stop working.
Has this ever happened? Not revoking certificates, which they've certainly done for malware or e.g. iOS "signing services", but because a developer used non-Apple hardware.
6 replies →