← Back to context Comment by Tadpole9181 17 days ago You have the burden of proof entirely backwards... 3 comments Tadpole9181 Reply esbranson 17 days ago I think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations. Tadpole9181 17 days ago What is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning? Schmerika 17 days ago You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.... Which is its own kind of proof.
esbranson 17 days ago I think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations. Tadpole9181 17 days ago What is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning? Schmerika 17 days ago You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.... Which is its own kind of proof.
Tadpole9181 17 days ago What is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning? Schmerika 17 days ago You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.... Which is its own kind of proof.
Schmerika 17 days ago You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.... Which is its own kind of proof.
I think the wrong burdens of proof are being used. "Reasonable suspicion" should be used for investigations.
What is it with the deluge of people on HN that suddenly don't believe in evidence-based reasoning?
You've confused 'evidence' with 'proof'.
There's way, way more than enough evidence to require investigation. Which could then possibly lead to a standard of proof...
If tptb investigated. Which they haven't, despite all the evidence.
... Which is its own kind of proof.