← Back to context

Comment by gonzus

20 days ago

Lacking support for structs, I think this is too minimalistic to be called "a C compiler".

Weren't structs a fairly late addition to C?

And anyway, isn't that kind of missing the point. 512 bytes isn't much. Your comment is nearly a 5th of that budget.

[flagged]

  • > but it seems there are others here who don't want to speak of the truth

    Or you know, just didn't get hung up on the blatantly obvious thing not being explicitly disclaimed right in the title, only in the preamble?