← Back to context Comment by pfdietz 18 days ago [flagged] 4 comments pfdietz Reply micromacrofoot 18 days ago The point is that there's so much bad spending that by comparison this is practically nothing to shake a stick at, and it produces actual science. pfdietz 18 days ago [flagged] SiempreViernes 18 days ago No, you just asserted that you think existing arguments are invalid, then accused a person who disregarded your assertion of being "dogmatic".
micromacrofoot 18 days ago The point is that there's so much bad spending that by comparison this is practically nothing to shake a stick at, and it produces actual science. pfdietz 18 days ago [flagged] SiempreViernes 18 days ago No, you just asserted that you think existing arguments are invalid, then accused a person who disregarded your assertion of being "dogmatic".
pfdietz 18 days ago [flagged] SiempreViernes 18 days ago No, you just asserted that you think existing arguments are invalid, then accused a person who disregarded your assertion of being "dogmatic".
SiempreViernes 18 days ago No, you just asserted that you think existing arguments are invalid, then accused a person who disregarded your assertion of being "dogmatic".
The point is that there's so much bad spending that by comparison this is practically nothing to shake a stick at, and it produces actual science.
[flagged]
No, you just asserted that you think existing arguments are invalid, then accused a person who disregarded your assertion of being "dogmatic".