← Back to context

Comment by eddythompson80

17 days ago

Whenever someone cites Citizens United, I'm 99.9% sure they have no idea what that ruling was about.

In other words: you are a reactionary who thinks little of others. Noted.

  • No because you literally have no idea what the citizen united ruling was based on what you wrote. Those 99.9% of people use “Citizen United” the way you used it. As a catch all for “corporate political contributions” except it wasn’t that impactful of a ruling regarding that.

    If you actually know what it was then answer how does limiting non-electioneering advertisements from PACs for 30 days out of the year changes anything?