← Back to context

Comment by simonster

12 days ago

If the government audited the company's tax records and disagreed that the fiber bars should've been expensed, they'd most likely charge tax, interest, and a penalty proportional to the $5 cost. Fraud requires intentional wrongdoing; no court or auditor is going to find that a company intentionally schemed to defraud the government of a couple dollars by sneaking fiber bars into a travel expense report.

We’ve all wasted a collective hundreds reading this thread but the only thing I can agree on is that fiber and hydration are essential for on-sites.