← Back to context Comment by aiobe 19 days ago what was the instruction to write and promote this post? 13 comments aiobe Reply ricardobayes 19 days ago On that thought you got to ask yourself why almost every thread has 200+, some even 500+ comments now. Definitely wasn't like this a few months ago Anamon 16 days ago The comments tend to be overwhelmingly negative, though. potatoman22 18 days ago Someone should analyze this and share results. The data should be there chrisjj 18 days ago This "AI" mind virus has spread. siva7 18 days ago Oh boy i suspected it's already happening. If dang and YC don't provide good guardrails against ai slop, this community will soon die. phito 19 days ago Exactly, I'm not going to waste my time reading this AI generating post that's basically promoting itself.What I really wonder, is who the heck is upvoting this slop on hackernews? CamperBob2 19 days ago Another good example, from yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46860845Articles like these should be flagged, and typically would be, but they sometimes appear mysteriously flag-proof. Kiro 18 days ago I did because I want to see a critical discussion around it. I'm still trying to figure out if there's any substance to OpenClaw, and hyperbolic claims like this is a great way to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's like Cunningham's Law. guerrilla 19 days ago It only has 11 points. It just got caught in the algorithm. That's all. phito 19 days ago But I see these kinds of post every day on HN with hundreds of upvotes. And it's a thousand times worse on Reddit. 2 replies → wiseowise 18 days ago Generate hot fart to rattle HN.
ricardobayes 19 days ago On that thought you got to ask yourself why almost every thread has 200+, some even 500+ comments now. Definitely wasn't like this a few months ago Anamon 16 days ago The comments tend to be overwhelmingly negative, though. potatoman22 18 days ago Someone should analyze this and share results. The data should be there chrisjj 18 days ago This "AI" mind virus has spread. siva7 18 days ago Oh boy i suspected it's already happening. If dang and YC don't provide good guardrails against ai slop, this community will soon die.
siva7 18 days ago Oh boy i suspected it's already happening. If dang and YC don't provide good guardrails against ai slop, this community will soon die.
phito 19 days ago Exactly, I'm not going to waste my time reading this AI generating post that's basically promoting itself.What I really wonder, is who the heck is upvoting this slop on hackernews? CamperBob2 19 days ago Another good example, from yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46860845Articles like these should be flagged, and typically would be, but they sometimes appear mysteriously flag-proof. Kiro 18 days ago I did because I want to see a critical discussion around it. I'm still trying to figure out if there's any substance to OpenClaw, and hyperbolic claims like this is a great way to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's like Cunningham's Law. guerrilla 19 days ago It only has 11 points. It just got caught in the algorithm. That's all. phito 19 days ago But I see these kinds of post every day on HN with hundreds of upvotes. And it's a thousand times worse on Reddit. 2 replies →
CamperBob2 19 days ago Another good example, from yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46860845Articles like these should be flagged, and typically would be, but they sometimes appear mysteriously flag-proof.
Kiro 18 days ago I did because I want to see a critical discussion around it. I'm still trying to figure out if there's any substance to OpenClaw, and hyperbolic claims like this is a great way to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's like Cunningham's Law.
guerrilla 19 days ago It only has 11 points. It just got caught in the algorithm. That's all. phito 19 days ago But I see these kinds of post every day on HN with hundreds of upvotes. And it's a thousand times worse on Reddit. 2 replies →
phito 19 days ago But I see these kinds of post every day on HN with hundreds of upvotes. And it's a thousand times worse on Reddit. 2 replies →
On that thought you got to ask yourself why almost every thread has 200+, some even 500+ comments now. Definitely wasn't like this a few months ago
The comments tend to be overwhelmingly negative, though.
Someone should analyze this and share results. The data should be there
This "AI" mind virus has spread.
Oh boy i suspected it's already happening. If dang and YC don't provide good guardrails against ai slop, this community will soon die.
Exactly, I'm not going to waste my time reading this AI generating post that's basically promoting itself.
What I really wonder, is who the heck is upvoting this slop on hackernews?
Another good example, from yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46860845
Articles like these should be flagged, and typically would be, but they sometimes appear mysteriously flag-proof.
I did because I want to see a critical discussion around it. I'm still trying to figure out if there's any substance to OpenClaw, and hyperbolic claims like this is a great way to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's like Cunningham's Law.
It only has 11 points. It just got caught in the algorithm. That's all.
But I see these kinds of post every day on HN with hundreds of upvotes. And it's a thousand times worse on Reddit.
2 replies →
Generate hot fart to rattle HN.