← Back to context

Comment by austinjp

19 days ago

Sometimes I think I'm the only person in the world who doesn't like this film.

I like it but it's not amazing. And I've seen it ... 4 or 5 or more times. It's just such an easy watch.

I think the deal is that the emotional beats in it work so well that the plot can be set aside. It's also not a problem that those beast aren't particularly clever or imaginative.

It's like a jump scare in a horror movie or Old Yeller. Even when you know what's going to happen you still startle or shed a tear. Honestly even when you know you're being manipulated and think it's cheesy you still get that response.

The weird thing to me about Shawshank is that it's not a monster out of the dark or a dog getting killed. It's not a cathartic thing but something else.

You're not alone. I find it pretty dull, manipulative and schmaltzy.

This is the great thing about art, there's no objective measurement, people are free to disagree and like what they like.

You may very well be! Why?

  • It's good for a single watch. I don't get how people can rewatch it without groaning non-stop. We get it, he's smarter than the warden and the warden hates him for it, prison sucks, and Morgan Freeman can make even the lamest cliches sound "deep".

    • The warden does not hate him for being smarter than him? The warden covets him for being smarter than him!

  • @padjo said it well. Schmaltzy and manipulative. Freeman's folksiness is eye-rollingly clichéd. I cringed throughout the film the first time I tried to watch it, and I haven't lasted more than a few minutes every other time I've tried.

    I am very well aware I'm in a minority, though!