← Back to context

Comment by burnt-resistor

19 days ago

This is a signal of failure of GH (Microsoft) to limit AI-based interactions, which is obviously not in their superficial strategic interests to do so.

This project though tries to solve a platform policy problem by throwing unnecessary barriers in front of casual but potentially/actually useful contributors.

Furthermore, it creates an "elite-takes-all", self-amplifying hierarchy of domination and rejection of new participants because they don't have enough inside friends and/or social credit points.

Fail. Stop using GH and find a platform that penalizes AI properly at its source.

How can you "limit AI-based interactions"? Also, is there any "platform that penalizes AI properly at its source"?