← Back to context Comment by me_bx 11 days ago Maybe they care about it being robust in the long run, maintainable, secure and/or not too bloated. 9 comments me_bx Reply WD-42 11 days ago Pretty much. I plan on using this program for a long time. I don’t want a codebase that looks like something out of a H.P. Lovecraft novel when I have to fix something in the future. igravious 11 days ago [flagged] WD-42 11 days ago Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame. 6 replies →
WD-42 11 days ago Pretty much. I plan on using this program for a long time. I don’t want a codebase that looks like something out of a H.P. Lovecraft novel when I have to fix something in the future. igravious 11 days ago [flagged] WD-42 11 days ago Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame. 6 replies →
igravious 11 days ago [flagged] WD-42 11 days ago Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame. 6 replies →
WD-42 11 days ago Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame. 6 replies →
Pretty much. I plan on using this program for a long time. I don’t want a codebase that looks like something out of a H.P. Lovecraft novel when I have to fix something in the future.
[flagged]
Are you serious? You don’t think I’m capable of running the codebase through an LLM? Or is this supposed to be some kind of gotchya? Rude and lame.
6 replies →