Comment by aristofun
8 days ago
This example once again shows me that being “pure” indie solo hacker is not sustainable.
You have to be first and foremost indie entrepreneur and indie salesman and only then you can afford free hacking if you have time left.
What does a "pure" indie solo hacker do? What does sustainable mean to you?
Not to assume your definitions but in my experience I often get the impression that "pure" means one just gets to code and not worry about anything else.
"indie" means one gets to pick what to code, how to code, when to code, why to code, etc.
"solo" means not having to deal with anyone one doesn't want to deal with.
"hacker" means standards, processes, tests, commits to main, etc. are only necessary when and if one wants them to be.
"sustainable" means at an equivalent or more income and less or similar costs as a job where someone else handles the marketing, sales, legal, design, anything one doesn't want/like to do as well as absorbing most of the downside risks of market shifts, loss of customers, competitor moves, etc. Additionally, one can go on vacation whenever they want and the income keeps coming.
All of this for as long as one wants the situation to last.
Sounds great to many I'm sure as it basically describes being a wealthy gentleman inventor/scientist/artist in 1880s England.
Most activities are hobbies until someone other than the participant is paying for it. Most everyone has a status of amateur until they get paid then convert to professional.
There are a lot of nuances in above statements and hobby and amateur are not reflective of lack of quality or expertise. There are I'm sure many hobbyists building wood chairs of finer quality than anyone can buy anywhere. It's up to them if they want to get paid for it.
May sound harsh to the person wanting their hobbies to be paid for unconditionally but if you're the one doing the paying it's reasonable to expect something out of the deal.
It doesn't prove the model won't work for anyone. It just shows that for this one person, it hasn't worked out awesome. I think there are some folks who end up doing quite well as solopreneurs, but they tend not to talk about it on the internet, lest their niche become more visible, which could erode their margins.
Did you notice how you used the word “solopreneur” thus supporting my point.
I don't think I understood the distinction between being a "pure indie solo hacker" and "indie entrepreneur"/"indie salesman".
Are you saying that one cannot make a living just hacking around?
1 reply →