← Back to context Comment by newswasboring 15 days ago No but someone does. If something goes wrong, someone would be able to debug and fix it. 4 comments newswasboring Reply small_model 15 days ago Indeed, his name is Claude sigseg1v 15 days ago I love using AI tooling but I'm not convinced it's safe to use straight to binary until we have 100% deterministic outputs from it. small_model 15 days ago Would two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time. newswasboring 14 days ago Bro, Claude is not a person.
small_model 15 days ago Indeed, his name is Claude sigseg1v 15 days ago I love using AI tooling but I'm not convinced it's safe to use straight to binary until we have 100% deterministic outputs from it. small_model 15 days ago Would two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time. newswasboring 14 days ago Bro, Claude is not a person.
sigseg1v 15 days ago I love using AI tooling but I'm not convinced it's safe to use straight to binary until we have 100% deterministic outputs from it. small_model 15 days ago Would two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time.
small_model 15 days ago Would two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time.
Indeed, his name is Claude
I love using AI tooling but I'm not convinced it's safe to use straight to binary until we have 100% deterministic outputs from it.
Would two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time.
Bro, Claude is not a person.