Comment by co_king_3
12 days ago
I don't know about you, but I benefit so much from using Claude at work that I would gladly pay $80,000-$120,000 per year to keep using it.
12 days ago
I don't know about you, but I benefit so much from using Claude at work that I would gladly pay $80,000-$120,000 per year to keep using it.
Why would you gladly pay more than what it's worth? It's not an engineer you are hiring, it's AI. The whole point of it was to make intelligent workflows cheaper. If it's going to cost as much as an engineer, hire the engineer, at least you'd have an escape goat when things invariably go wrong.
> an escape goat
Autocorrect hall of famer, there.
Scapegoat, got it. Can't blame the autocorrect though... I honestly thought it was spelled like that, which is a shame since I've been studying English my entire life as a second language.
5 replies →
I agree with you, I was just joking.
Oh now I see... Joke's on me then I guess :D
1 reply →
What do you use it for, do you have example? For you to be ok with paying 80k to 120k I'm guessing its making you 375-450k a year?
I'm joking, my point is that it's already quite expensive and I don't think it's making anyone money.
Oh come on. That pays for more than 10 fte in some countries
I made this joke with "$1,500-$2000 per month" last night and everyone thought I was serious
I know people who burned several hundreds a day and still were finding it worth it.
4 replies →
I would probably pay $2000 a month if I had to - it's a small fraction of my salary, and the productivity boost is worth it.
6 replies →
that means customers will pay minimum 2x that much I think
[flagged]