← Back to context Comment by GrinningFool 6 days ago So far, in the US, LLM output is not copyrightable:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922 3 comments GrinningFool Reply burnte 6 days ago Yes, I said that. That doesn't mean that the output might not be plagiarized. I was correcting that the problem wasn't about rights assignment because there are no rights to assign. Specifically, no copyrights. GrinningFool 6 days ago > Since it has copyright being machine created, there are no rights to transfer, anyone can use it, it's public domain.Maybe you meant to include a "doesn't" in that case? burnte 6 days ago should have said "Since it has no copyright"
burnte 6 days ago Yes, I said that. That doesn't mean that the output might not be plagiarized. I was correcting that the problem wasn't about rights assignment because there are no rights to assign. Specifically, no copyrights. GrinningFool 6 days ago > Since it has copyright being machine created, there are no rights to transfer, anyone can use it, it's public domain.Maybe you meant to include a "doesn't" in that case? burnte 6 days ago should have said "Since it has no copyright"
GrinningFool 6 days ago > Since it has copyright being machine created, there are no rights to transfer, anyone can use it, it's public domain.Maybe you meant to include a "doesn't" in that case? burnte 6 days ago should have said "Since it has no copyright"
Yes, I said that. That doesn't mean that the output might not be plagiarized. I was correcting that the problem wasn't about rights assignment because there are no rights to assign. Specifically, no copyrights.
> Since it has copyright being machine created, there are no rights to transfer, anyone can use it, it's public domain.
Maybe you meant to include a "doesn't" in that case?
should have said "Since it has no copyright"