← Back to context

Comment by MisterTea

14 days ago

This feels like the most likely scenario. Especially since the meat bag behind the original AI PR responded with "Now with 100% more meat" meaning they were behind the original PR in the first place. It's obvious they got miffed at their PR being rejected and decided to do a little role playing to vent their unjustified anger.

>It's obvious they got miffed at their PR being rejected and decided to do a little role playing to vent their unjustified anger.

In that case, apologizing almost immediately after seems strange.

EDIT:

>Especially since the meat bag behind the original AI PR responded with "Now with 100% more meat"

This person was not the original 'meat bag' behind the original AI.

  • Really? I'd think a human being would be more likely to recognize they'd crossed a boundary with another human, step back, and address the issue with some reflection?

    If apologizing is more likely the response of an AI agent than a human that's either... somewhat hopeful in one sense, and supremely disappointing in another.

    • A human is obviously capable of a turn around. I just won't expect it to happen right after. Of course, it's not like that couldn't happen either.

    • > I'd think a human being would be more likely to recognize they'd crossed a boundary with another human

      Please. We're autistic software engineers here, we totally don't do stuff like "recognize they'd crossed a boundary".

Its also a fake profile. 90+ hits for the image on Tineye.

Name also maps to a Holocaust victim.

I posted in the other thread that I think someone deleted it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46990651