← Back to context Comment by winstonp 9 days ago DeepSeek hasn't been SotA in at least 12 calendar months, which might as well be a decade in LLM years 5 comments winstonp Reply cachius 9 days ago What about Kimi and GLM? zozbot234 9 days ago These are well behind the general state of the art (1yr or so), though they're arguably the best openly-available models. tgrowazay 9 days ago According to artificial analysis ranking, GLM-5 is at #4 after Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 . epolanski 9 days ago Idk man, GLM 5 in my tests matches opus 4.5 which is what, two months old? 1 reply →
cachius 9 days ago What about Kimi and GLM? zozbot234 9 days ago These are well behind the general state of the art (1yr or so), though they're arguably the best openly-available models. tgrowazay 9 days ago According to artificial analysis ranking, GLM-5 is at #4 after Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 . epolanski 9 days ago Idk man, GLM 5 in my tests matches opus 4.5 which is what, two months old? 1 reply →
zozbot234 9 days ago These are well behind the general state of the art (1yr or so), though they're arguably the best openly-available models. tgrowazay 9 days ago According to artificial analysis ranking, GLM-5 is at #4 after Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 . epolanski 9 days ago Idk man, GLM 5 in my tests matches opus 4.5 which is what, two months old? 1 reply →
tgrowazay 9 days ago According to artificial analysis ranking, GLM-5 is at #4 after Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 .
epolanski 9 days ago Idk man, GLM 5 in my tests matches opus 4.5 which is what, two months old? 1 reply →
What about Kimi and GLM?
These are well behind the general state of the art (1yr or so), though they're arguably the best openly-available models.
According to artificial analysis ranking, GLM-5 is at #4 after Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2-xhigh and Claude Opus 4.6 .
Idk man, GLM 5 in my tests matches opus 4.5 which is what, two months old?
1 reply →