← Back to context Comment by awakeasleep 10 days ago A competing format to simplify things? 5 comments awakeasleep Reply bhaak 10 days ago A competing format that is understandable to probably everybody.An ISO 8601 date is also comprehensible to anybody even if they never seen it before and have to figure it out themselves. fifilura 10 days ago Comprehensible?https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/ bhaak 9 days ago I said date. Not time, not timestamp, not period, not week, not range, not ordinal date.Just date. 1 reply → ultratalk 10 days ago https://xkcd.com/927/
bhaak 10 days ago A competing format that is understandable to probably everybody.An ISO 8601 date is also comprehensible to anybody even if they never seen it before and have to figure it out themselves. fifilura 10 days ago Comprehensible?https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/ bhaak 9 days ago I said date. Not time, not timestamp, not period, not week, not range, not ordinal date.Just date. 1 reply →
fifilura 10 days ago Comprehensible?https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/ bhaak 9 days ago I said date. Not time, not timestamp, not period, not week, not range, not ordinal date.Just date. 1 reply →
bhaak 9 days ago I said date. Not time, not timestamp, not period, not week, not range, not ordinal date.Just date. 1 reply →
A competing format that is understandable to probably everybody.
An ISO 8601 date is also comprehensible to anybody even if they never seen it before and have to figure it out themselves.
Comprehensible?
https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/
I said date. Not time, not timestamp, not period, not week, not range, not ordinal date.
Just date.
1 reply →
https://xkcd.com/927/