← Back to context Comment by cpard 5 days ago the c compiler results or the physics results this post is about? 11 comments cpard Reply elzbardico 5 days ago The C compiler. cpard 5 days ago of course the results were much worse than what was communicated on the media, it was content marketing not an attempt to build a better c compiler. NewsaHackO 5 days ago His point is going to be some copium like since the c compiler is not as optimized as gcc, it was not impressive. elzbardico 5 days ago You probably don’t know what you’re talking about. NewsaHackO 5 days ago Why wasn't the C compiler it made impressive to you? 6 replies →
elzbardico 5 days ago The C compiler. cpard 5 days ago of course the results were much worse than what was communicated on the media, it was content marketing not an attempt to build a better c compiler.
cpard 5 days ago of course the results were much worse than what was communicated on the media, it was content marketing not an attempt to build a better c compiler.
NewsaHackO 5 days ago His point is going to be some copium like since the c compiler is not as optimized as gcc, it was not impressive. elzbardico 5 days ago You probably don’t know what you’re talking about. NewsaHackO 5 days ago Why wasn't the C compiler it made impressive to you? 6 replies →
elzbardico 5 days ago You probably don’t know what you’re talking about. NewsaHackO 5 days ago Why wasn't the C compiler it made impressive to you? 6 replies →
The C compiler.
of course the results were much worse than what was communicated on the media, it was content marketing not an attempt to build a better c compiler.
His point is going to be some copium like since the c compiler is not as optimized as gcc, it was not impressive.
You probably don’t know what you’re talking about.
Why wasn't the C compiler it made impressive to you?
6 replies →