Comment by charcircuit
7 days ago
And then social media feeds will ban you using their AI. Also my family and I's AI will filter your posts so we don't see them.
>I guess you're making an "if everyone had guns" argument?
Sure why not.
7 days ago
And then social media feeds will ban you using their AI. Also my family and I's AI will filter your posts so we don't see them.
>I guess you're making an "if everyone had guns" argument?
Sure why not.
It's a mistake to assume that all or most technologies actually reach stable equilibrium when they're pitted against each other.
It's far better than everyone has nukes than just a few people who are highly interested in ruining your mind and/or finances. Governments, crime syndicates can pay for HHH-less AI.
There you are sneaking in a technology that does equilibriate (nuclear weapons) to simply assert that this is a technology that does the same.
> It's far better than everyone has anthrax than just a few people who are highly interested in...
Doesn't point to the same conclusion, does it?