Comment by charcircuit
11 days ago
And then social media feeds will ban you using their AI. Also my family and I's AI will filter your posts so we don't see them.
>I guess you're making an "if everyone had guns" argument?
Sure why not.
11 days ago
And then social media feeds will ban you using their AI. Also my family and I's AI will filter your posts so we don't see them.
>I guess you're making an "if everyone had guns" argument?
Sure why not.
It's a mistake to assume that all or most technologies actually reach stable equilibrium when they're pitted against each other.
It's far better than everyone has nukes than just a few people who are highly interested in ruining your mind and/or finances. Governments, crime syndicates can pay for HHH-less AI.
There you are sneaking in a technology that does equilibriate (nuclear weapons) to simply assert that this is a technology that does the same.
> It's far better than everyone has anthrax than just a few people who are highly interested in...
Doesn't point to the same conclusion, does it?