← Back to context Comment by minimaxir 7 days ago I obviously cannot post the real unsafe examples. 4 comments minimaxir Reply nradov 7 days ago [flagged] Dylan16807 6 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)#Sexual_deepfake... ddtaylor 6 days ago HN values discussion without attacking others. If you disagree with something someone says, then addressing their claims directly is the best option. nradov 5 days ago There's nothing wrong with attacking a lame, low-effort comment made with zero evidence.
nradov 7 days ago [flagged] Dylan16807 6 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)#Sexual_deepfake... ddtaylor 6 days ago HN values discussion without attacking others. If you disagree with something someone says, then addressing their claims directly is the best option. nradov 5 days ago There's nothing wrong with attacking a lame, low-effort comment made with zero evidence.
ddtaylor 6 days ago HN values discussion without attacking others. If you disagree with something someone says, then addressing their claims directly is the best option. nradov 5 days ago There's nothing wrong with attacking a lame, low-effort comment made with zero evidence.
nradov 5 days ago There's nothing wrong with attacking a lame, low-effort comment made with zero evidence.
[flagged]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)#Sexual_deepfake...
HN values discussion without attacking others. If you disagree with something someone says, then addressing their claims directly is the best option.
There's nothing wrong with attacking a lame, low-effort comment made with zero evidence.