← Back to context Comment by azan_ 7 days ago Approx. 5% of all cancers in US are caused by CTs 9 comments azan_ Reply ErroneousBosh 7 days ago [citation needed] lostlogin 7 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 6 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
ErroneousBosh 7 days ago [citation needed] lostlogin 7 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 6 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
lostlogin 7 days ago 5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat... ErroneousBosh 6 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
ErroneousBosh 6 days ago I think they're reading too much into it.How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"? 6 replies →
[citation needed]
5% seems a bit high, but we are nearly there.
https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publicat...
I think they're reading too much into it.
How are they determining "this cancer was caused by the CT scan" versus "this cancer was caused by the cancer we were originally looking for that was there all along"?
6 replies →